Category:Semilocal functionals: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The local and semilocal [[exchange-correlation functionals]] depend locally on quantities like the electron density <math>n</math> or the kinetic-energy density <math>\tau</math>. Most of them can be classified into three subcategories: | The local and semilocal [[exchange-correlation functionals]] depend locally on quantities like the electron density <math>n</math> or the kinetic-energy density <math>\tau</math>. Most of them can be classified into one of these three main subcategories, that differ : | ||
* | * Local density approximation (LDA): | ||
:<math>E_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}=\int\epsilon_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}(n)d^{3}r</math> | :<math> | ||
E_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}=\int\epsilon_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}(n)d^{3}r | |||
</math> | |||
* Generalized-gradient approximation (GGA): | |||
:<math> | |||
E_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{MGGA}}=\int\epsilon_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{MGGA}}(n,\nabla n,\nabla^{2}n,\tau)d^{3}r, | |||
</math> | |||
Most of them are either of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) or of the meta-GGA. | Most of them are either of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) or of the meta-GGA. |
Revision as of 10:02, 25 February 2025
The local and semilocal exchange-correlation functionals depend locally on quantities like the electron density or the kinetic-energy density . Most of them can be classified into one of these three main subcategories, that differ :
- Local density approximation (LDA):
- Generalized-gradient approximation (GGA):
Most of them are either of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) or of the meta-GGA.
- the functionals of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) and
that, in addition to the electron density and the gradient , depend also on
- the kinetic-energy density , and/or
- the Laplacian of the electron density .
Thus, the exchange-correlation energy can be written as
which leads to the exchange-correlation potential having the form
Although meta-GGAs are slightly more expensive than GGAs, they are still fast to evaluate and appropriate for very large systems. Furthermore, meta-GGAs can be more accurate than GGAs and more broadly applicable. Note that as in most other codes, meta-GGAs are implemented in VASP (see METAGGA) within the generalized KS scheme[1].
How to
A meta-GGA functional can be used by specifying
in the INCAR file.
How to do a band-structure calculation using meta-GGA functionals.
This category currently contains no pages or media.