Category:Semilocal functionals: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The local and semilocal [[exchange-correlation functionals]] depend locally on quantities like the electron density <math>n</math> or the kinetic-energy density <math>\tau</math>. Most of them can be classified into three subcategories:
The local and semilocal [[exchange-correlation functionals]] depend locally on quantities like the electron density <math>n</math> or the kinetic-energy density <math>\tau</math>. Most of them can be classified into one of these three main subcategories, that differ :
* The local density approximation (LDA):
* Local density approximation (LDA):
:<math>E_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}=\int\epsilon_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}(n)d^{3}r</math>
:<math>
E_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}=\int\epsilon_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{LDA}}(n)d^{3}r
</math>
 
* Generalized-gradient approximation (GGA):
:<math>
E_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{MGGA}}=\int\epsilon_{\mathrm{xc}}^{\mathrm{MGGA}}(n,\nabla n,\nabla^{2}n,\tau)d^{3}r,
</math>


  Most of them are either of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) or of the meta-GGA.
  Most of them are either of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) or of the meta-GGA.

Revision as of 10:02, 25 February 2025

The local and semilocal exchange-correlation functionals depend locally on quantities like the electron density or the kinetic-energy density . Most of them can be classified into one of these three main subcategories, that differ :

  • Local density approximation (LDA):
  • Generalized-gradient approximation (GGA):
Most of them are either of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) or of the meta-GGA.
the functionals of the generalized-gradient approximation (GGA) and
 that, in addition to the electron density  and the gradient , depend also on 
  • the kinetic-energy density , and/or
  • the Laplacian of the electron density .

Thus, the exchange-correlation energy can be written as

which leads to the exchange-correlation potential having the form

Although meta-GGAs are slightly more expensive than GGAs, they are still fast to evaluate and appropriate for very large systems. Furthermore, meta-GGAs can be more accurate than GGAs and more broadly applicable. Note that as in most other codes, meta-GGAs are implemented in VASP (see METAGGA) within the generalized KS scheme[1].

How to

A meta-GGA functional can be used by specifying

in the INCAR file.

How to do a band-structure calculation using meta-GGA functionals.


This category currently contains no pages or media.